POA Caselaw Necessity

Necessity

5 decisions in this topic.

Perka v The Queen

[1984] 2 SCR 232 · Supreme Court of Canada · importing cannabis

Perka v. The Queen

[1984] 2 S.C.R. 232
Supreme Court of Canada — Ritchie, Dickson, Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson JJ. | January 31, February 1; October 11, 1984


Background

William Perka and three co-accused were drug …

Read the Decision

R v Card

[2000] O.J. No. 2333 · Ontario Court of Justice · speeding

R. v. Card

[2000] O.J. No. 2333
Ontario Court of Justice — Livingstone J. | January 10, 2000


Background

Gary Card was driving on a country road at 11 p.m. after meeting his son to exchange …

Read the Decision

R v HALES

[1995] O.J. No. 735

Read the Decision

R v Haynen

[2002] O.J. No. 4943

Read the Decision

R v Perka1984canlii23

1984canlii23

Read the Decision

Facing a necessity issue?

Knowing the caselaw is half the fight — applying it to your facts is the other half. Free consultation, straight answers.

Licensed Paralegal — Not a Law Firm. Carli Geist is regulated by the Law Society of Ontario. Services are limited to the authorized scope of paralegal practice. Nothing on this site is legal advice.